I never really use it (apart from teaching my pupils to play a chromatic scale - and half of them ignore me anyway)..
.. but I do quite like having it.
I never really use it (apart from teaching my pupils to play a chromatic scale - and half of them ignore me anyway)..
.. but I do quite like having it.
"The sound of tireless voices is the price we pay for the right to hear the music of our own opinions."
Enlightenment demands that the unproven remains open to question. (Captain Beeflat. 2005)
I consider this key to be an essential tool, one that I use quite often - it makes some passages much easier & cleaner at speed.
It also offers a slightly more "fluid" fingering for F# to G trill, leaving the side F# key down. Uses index finger instead of middle finger, and moves only one key cup instead of two.
Contentment is not the fulfilment of what you want, but the realisation of how much you already have.
That's comparing apples to oranges.
It would probably cost even more to produce a saxophone without the F# trill key because they would need to change the tooling and aerodynamics are irrelevant.
You'll find that most saxophone techs haven't worked in the aircraft industry, it's not exactly a prerequisite.
" M'enfin ! " ....Gaston Lagaffe
This thread indicates that the F# trill key is not necessary for some people, but it is necessary for many others.
Some people apparently believe that flipping fingers is "good enough." Just like some people find the sound they get from synthetic reeds to be "good enough." That's fine for them, but, try as they might, they're not going to convince too many other people of it. Many people believe that "good enough" is not good enough if you can do better.
Buck
Only then would they understand the importance of excess weight, complexity, cost, & total reliability.
When you can make a weightless, ever reliable, f# trill key & guard which costs nothing in terms of material & time....then fit it at no extra cost, just let me know.
Enlightenment demands that the unproven remains open to question. (Captain Beeflat. 2005)
You're still comparing apples and oranges.
Weight is an important factor in the aircraft industry but it's irrelevant for saxophones.
Think of the extra keys that have been added on over the years (high F#, G on some sopranos, tilting spatulas), the extra key guards, the double arms. All of this adds extra weight but it doesn't take away from performance.
" M'enfin ! " ....Gaston Lagaffe
That thing is a key??? I thought it was the side spit valve...
Do forgive me, but weight is an important area in any area of production.....you are confusing marketing gimmicks with what is necessary.
Your earlier point concerning the tooling costs in leaving out the F# trill key is also flawed.
Were the sax a casting or a moulding you would, to a degree, have a valid point.
The saxophone, however, is fabricated....all the operations being carried out on jigs....to leave out one of these operations would, therefore, be no problem, & save both time & costs.
warp x
Just keep practising as you seem so fond of trills.![]()
Enlightenment demands that the unproven remains open to question. (Captain Beeflat. 2005)
I use all of the "extras", often. They were good ideas and remain so.
Come see me live with Platinum Express
Grovelling apologies....I took it to be a joke.
Perhaps therefore, as you claim it to be serious, Mr. Happy should mention in the instructions that, under no circumstances should this product be applied to the D finger, which must, at all times, be free to grope across, just occasionally, for an out of line key.
Enlightenment demands that the unproven remains open to question. (Captain Beeflat. 2005)
One cannot fail to be impressed with your modesty.
At every opportunity you are sufficiently self effacing to admit to your inability to play synthetic reeds. What is this sound that you seek?...one wonders if you are perhaps confusing the saxophone sound with that of a banjo.
Many of us...including Pete Thomas, achieve a good sax sound from synthetics. I would be grateful if you could explain just what, exactly, is wrong with Pete Thomas' sound.
Enlightenment demands that the unproven remains open to question. (Captain Beeflat. 2005)
Bookmarks