The thing is Hans, that despite the rather innocent fun and games which you are subject to, you come to the forum (and I commend you to have done that!) saying that you have found something that others doubt. Therefore, in my view the burden of proof is always on those who claim they have discovered anything and, in order for any new discovery or theory, you need to provide some evidence that can be considered objective in order for others to replicate your experiments and findings.
This is , in essence, the scientific method that I trust you are familiar with but I quote this link all the same for you to refer to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
There you read among other things: "........ Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies to test these hypotheses via predictions which can be derived from them. These steps must be repeatable, to guard against mistake or confusion in any particular experimenter. Theories that encompass wider domains of inquiry may bind many independently derived hypotheses together in a coherent, supportive structure. Theories, in turn, may help form new hypotheses or place groups of hypotheses into context.
Scientific inquiry is generally intended to be as objective as possible, to reduce biased interpretations of results. Another basic expectation is to document, archive and share all data and methodology so they are available for careful scrutiny by other scientists, giving them the opportunity to verify results by attempting to reproduce them. This practice, called full disclosure, also allows statistical measures of the reliability of these data to be established........"
Which means that you cannot expect to say: " I've tried it and other illustrious players tried it and believe in it therefore it must be true...."
The marketing Gobbledygook is what it is! I wouldn't necessarily hold you responsible to the " more sound, more emotion, more colour, more enjoyment " thing........those are things that advertising people say in order to sell things...........you are not the only one doing that, if we would scrutinise the ads of most things advertised in the world ( of music or not) we would find things that are of the same questionable and inexplicable nature (What is SEAT auto emotion for crying out loud?).
You have to understand that there is a long history of people claiming they have found the ultimate " gizmo" to play better and you are another one in a long list.
Some place semi-precious stones in places carefully and secretly chosen, some put weights, some mass-load ligatures, some put resonance gizmos, some others place magnets on the horn or on the keys(!?), some have sound enhancers in the neck of a saxophone, some sell crown for flutes with different coloured stones to give a different colour to the sound or say they use a metal hook to improve resonance......assuming that there is any audible resonance to improve!
There was also a guy who sought to semi choke his saxophone neck to strangle his sound into a better one and believed in it. I think that the skeptics (I certainly am one) might be forgiven a certain amount of sarcasm.........we have seen a lot and unabashed nonsense masked as matter of fact-common sense!
All of this people say they hear differences of some sort due to their gizmo , some find other (sometimes famous) people to hear it too, NOBODY ever came up with a scientifically meaningful test proving that their implement does anything, let alone working at doing what they say it should do!
You have a great chance. Be the first one to do so! Get in touch with some scientifically relevant researchers who are interested in acoustic studies (TNO Delft ? UNSW in Australia?) and produce some scientifically acceptable study otherwise you are putting yourself in the doubtful position of someone selling some snake oil even if some players are prepared to back you up.
(come to think of it there should be also things working AGAINST a good vibration production, how come nobody mentions any of those?)