PDA

View Full Version : RPC Mouthpieces


Grumps
02-03-2003, 01:51 AM
Just wondering if some of you good folks could share some experiences with RPC mouthpieces. I'm interested in baritone mouthpieces in particular, but alto and tenor experiences would be welcome as well.

Subtone Sam
02-03-2003, 02:05 AM
Grumps,I have the bari RPC .125.Very good mpc,especially for section playing.Big,fat sound,very easy to play,low notes pop out with less effort than most pieces.Great blend of bright&dark.

johnny
02-03-2003, 02:06 AM
I'll just say that ever since I acquired my RPC tenor and alto pieces, I've never had even the slightest urge to try anything else. IMO, they're just that good.

garyinla
02-03-2003, 02:59 AM
I tried an RPC alto .090 hard rubber. It was as good as any other hard rubber alto one I ever tried. I dont own one, but I would like to get one someday. In WWBW they sell .085 and not .090 but I would go for a .090 since the one I played was easy to play (for me.)
This was a general mouthpiece of a NY Meyer or Brilhart type.

Toni Linder
02-03-2003, 02:27 PM
I have been playing a RPC .85 alto mouthpiece for some years now. It's a great mouthpiece with a full, rich, velvety sound; you will need to push through quite a lot of air, though.

Dr G
02-03-2003, 04:11 PM
Just wondering if some of you good folks could share some experiences with RPC mouthpieces. I'm interested in baritone mouthpieces in particular, but alto and tenor experiences would be welcome as well.

I think that baritone is where Ron excels. To hear it from Ron, that is his sax of choice and his bari 'pieces reflect that, in my experience. I have played and enjoyed his alto (090) and tenor (105, 110, 160) mouthpieces but the one that really stands out is the .110 'piece he made for me several years ago.

Thomas
02-03-2003, 11:45 PM
Today I received an RPC .110 for tenor. Plays well,easy blow and sounds sweet on the Comm II tenor but too soon to tell how I like it on the VII tenor. Gotta do some reed work 2.5 Superials and DC's are pretty good but the RR 3's ain't bad either and would appreciate input about a good lig choice but please don't mention Rovners...I just plain don't like them.

shortwhite
02-03-2003, 11:51 PM
I have been using one of Ron's bari mouthpieces for almost 5 years. Best thing I have found yet. Works great in every genre I have needed. PHAT sound. I am curious about the Jaguar though.

I also play one of Ron's alto mouthpieces and love it.

Jazzed
02-04-2003, 01:52 AM
I really dig my RPC tenor .150. It amazed me out of the box and after 2 years and many gigs it still is my main piece. It's all about tone. Very flexible. Not for beginners however.

Nefertiti
02-04-2003, 02:52 AM
How on earth can anyone play a .150. I trust you guys but it's hard to imagine. I play a .120. I can't imagine playing something as big as a .150. Is the baffle high in this piece to make it easier to play?

Jazzed
02-04-2003, 06:53 AM
Nefertiti,

The big number scared me too, but Ron assured me it was ez to play. Plus he has a great return policy, so I felt like I had nothing to loose. I put a lot of air thru a horn and was gravitiating to larger and larger tip openings over the years. I think the secret is that it's set up to use a soft baritone sax reed. It actually plays easier than some Link 7 and 8*s I have had with tenor #3-4 reeds.

Try some #2 baritone sax reeds on your .120, you might like it and you might get the feel of what I'm talking about.

MojoBari
02-04-2003, 02:30 PM
Nef, I normally play .105" tips and had no problems playing a .150" RPC. Some people do though. It is faced in a way that it feels more like a .130". It is designed to use Bari sax reeds.

I do not think it is a good all-around piece, but it was fun.

Thomas
02-05-2003, 02:17 PM
As posted above I received an RPC .110 tenor piece a couple of days ago.I've used Links on tenor 40 years + but I'm telling you this tenor piece is the best sounding and playing piece I've ever used-works flawlessly on both tenors and does it all using Superial 2.5's and 3's. Got so excited I called Ron C right up and ordered an alto piece from him. Call him-get these pieces-they're good..

geo@loyola.edu
02-05-2003, 07:25 PM
I use RPC's on everything from soprano to bass. I concur with something said above: I have no desire to try anything else.

You can't get 'em from WW&BW. Ron told me on the phone he cancelled that relationship. That means you must wait and wait, because, whatever Ron does, he doesn't do it quickly.

Keep an eye on EBay. I got several there---no waiting, and they go for about what WW&BW lists them for.

Geo

Keith Ridenhour
03-02-2003, 06:53 PM
I played a 130 RPC on tenor for about a year. It was easy to play , had a versital sound and the alt is amazing. The only thing it couldn't do was get the metalic core of the contemporary tenors you hear on the quiet jazz stations and I was trying for a brecker tone and couldn't get close with that piece so I sold it. But I do miss a C 5 whenever I wanted it. I tryed the bari reeds on it but went back to tenor reeds to add core to the sound. I have a couple of sound clips from a demo CD using the RPC and a yanni 900 if you're interested. K

saxmanglen
03-17-2007, 03:07 AM
Hey Grumps! What do you think of RPC's four years later?

Grumps
03-17-2007, 03:27 AM
Wow, four years.

Funny, I was looking for a baritone mouthpiece for that finicky New Wonder, and didn't get a hold of an RPC for bari for about three years after that initial post. The first RPC I ended up with shortly after this thread began was the 125 high baffled model that is still my primary tenor mouthpiece. Next was the tenor rollover that I use for softer stuff, and about two years later I got a hold of an alto V90 which had me sell my vintage Meyer (and is still my primary alto mouthpiece). But going back to this thread, man I wish I wouldn't have been such a cheap bastard and waited three years to find one for bari on the second hand market. It turned out to be the last mouthpiece (out of dozens of previous trades and deals) I found that finally gave that old Conn the modern edge I needed and was long enough to play it in tune.

BayviewSax
03-17-2007, 02:44 PM
Steve: I bought one of the fabled .150s just to test the theory that only one existed. Within 2 weeks, two more showed up for sale. I was going to just flip it or trade it, but I have to second Mojo's take. It plays MUCH smaller. In fact, I was able to play it pretty easily with ZZ3s, but for kicks, I threw a Rico 1.5 bari reed on it, and that's what I play when I back-up a singer now. It's a real breathy sound, but easy to control.

I have 2 .120B tenor pieces and a .115B tenor. The .120 is THE piece, but my back-up horn is a Kessler, and it's a little darker, so I use the .115B on that. I also have a .090R alto and a .085B (opened to a .095), both of which are outstanding. The B has more of that Bartz edge, and the R is a fatter sound. I've played two .110B bari pieces and the .125B that I currently think of before intimate times with my wife -- yes, it's that good. I'd still like to score a .120B or .115B for bari as a backup. I also had a custom baffled .120 bari pieced that Pete Gaylord has now. It was higher than the rollover, but not quite the full wedge Ron uses in the "B" model now.

The "one that got away" was a .125R that I got from someone here. I flipped it because I just couldn't quite make the air (shoulda held onto it), and a week later the seller I got it from was inquiring about it.

RPCs rule.

Grumps
03-17-2007, 03:37 PM
I also had a custom baffled .120 bari pieced that Pete Gaylord has now. It was higher than the rollover, but not quite the full wedge Ron uses in the "B" model now.
I know this goes back to an old argument, but forgetting that for a moment, can you describe how your 120 custom piece differed from the 125R that got away? Did either, or both pieces, have that two step drop?

I tell you, I have been tempted in regard to one of those 150's. I was speaking to Ron a while ago about a custom order and that was the piece he was steering me towards. Some day, perhaps.

BayviewSax
03-17-2007, 04:01 PM
The difference between the .120 custom bari and .120R tenor was EXTREME. The tenor piece didn't even look like it had a baffle. It just flowed straight into the chamber (What a SOUND!). The bari piece had a noticable quantity of material, but no distinct "step" to it. Ron uses an art apoxy to make his baffles now, but the bari piece looked to be formed by removing material from the blank. I've played the rollover bari model, (a .110) and didn't care for it. The baffle in this .120 was NOT the rollover, it was definitely a distinct design. Going back to that original discussion, I wouldn't say it was a high-baffle (for an RPC), but rather a custom baffle that doesn't fit either class. I believe Pete has added to it to create a high baffle, but check with him.

Grumps
03-17-2007, 04:10 PM
The difference between the .120 custom bari and .120R tenor was EXTREME.
No, I meant the 125R "that got away"; not a comparison with a tenor rollover. I had thought that was a bari model and wanted to know how they compare.
I've played the rollover bari model, (a .110) and didn't care for it. The baffle in this .120 was NOT the rollover, it was definitely a distinct design. Going back to that original discussion, I wouldn't say it was a high-baffle (for an RPC), but rather a custom baffle that doesn't fit either class.
Okay, so the 110 rollover for bari that you had didn't have that two step drop? So it's more like the tenor rollover? Here's a picture of my 120 for bari with the two step drop:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v383/grmpyoldmn/RPCcustomBari.jpg
Ron has told me that this is his rollover design for bari. I'm just wondering if the earlier bari rollovers were different.

Hobbes
03-21-2007, 12:27 PM
Only a question.
The Tenor's RPC.R or the RPC.B are medium or large chamber??

BayviewSax
03-22-2007, 12:46 AM
Grumps: The .125 that got away was a tenor piece.

Interesting, I hadn't seen the rollover 2-step before. As I recall the piece, it was not a two-step, but again, I'd check with Pete if you're really curious.

hakukani
03-22-2007, 12:48 AM
Only a question.
The Tenor's RPC.R or the RPC.B are medium or large chamber??

I think Ron only makes one chamber size. I might be wrong...

Hobbes
03-22-2007, 10:39 AM
ok. But what??? large?

StittsIt
03-24-2007, 05:44 AM
I'd say medium-large. I owned an RPC .125 rollover for years, which I traded to Mark. Although I found the piece to be limiting for the direction in sound concept that I'm going towards, it was absolutely the best piece I've ever played. It made no sense to keep it simply because my concept of tone had changed and I wanted something more spread and Linkish, but everytime I think about selling it, I regret. If someone gets it, don't let it get away!