PDA

View Full Version : selmer soloist- vintage or modern?



Benny
09-14-2007, 06:23 AM
I've trawled through searches and been unable to find a definative comparision between the vintage soloist (horse-shoe chamber) and the modern ones.
I played a vintage C* yesterday and it was gorgeous, but it would be so much easier to get a modern one. Problem is, most local stores don't stock them in a variety of sizes so trying one is hard. Before I ordered one on the net I wanted to try and get some opinions.
Can anyone help??
Thanks

MM
09-14-2007, 05:23 PM
I also wonder are they all pretty dark or ? I have a really nice Soloist C* that is pretty flexible, just not all that loud. If you get an E or F would it be more of a Kenny Garrett thing or is it a lot of effort to push one to that place?

tdeane
09-14-2007, 05:51 PM
The new Soloist is not as good as the old one. The chamber is a little smaller and they play brighter. Also, the facing is longer which makes a big difference. Kenny Garrett actually doesn't play a Soloist. He plays the later non soloist long shank with an E facing.

simma
09-16-2007, 02:28 AM
Hi Benn,

Im glad you liked the soloist :) , best mouthpiece i have ever tried but i dont know if there would be much difference between the new and the old ones. But you are correct, it would have been heaps better if the opening was a C** or a D.

HOUSTON NONET
09-16-2007, 02:34 AM
good?-- anybody try both

decade
10-01-2007, 10:29 AM
I have a Short Shank C* with horseshoe chamber, which I have read is the same as the longer version, although the shorter version brings in more money on ebay.

I can't compare it to the newer soloist because I haven't played any, but I will offer my comparison to a S80 C*.

The Short shank has a much "sweeter" sound, which can be heard in the palm keys. Using the same reed, the short shank has a bit of edge, but not nearly as harsh as the S80. Hard to write in words, because I'm describing what I hear... hope that helps somewhat.

LeftySaxDude
10-01-2007, 05:11 PM
Kenny Garrett actually plays on a Fred Rast customized Selmer Soloist-style piece. It may have started out as an E, but Rast really opened it up to a .096" and opened the chamber a bit, and thinned the rails also. Kenny actually has a bag full of soloists that he takes with him on tour, but he almost always comes back to one that Rast customized.

Swampcabbage
10-01-2007, 05:18 PM
Selmer did a re-issue of the scroll shank which you can still find at some places. I like them. I don't know how they really stack against the old ones. But, I have a D and an F. Both are very nice playing pieces. Nice and fat, darker sound. I believe the older ones have a mellower sound and not as much bite to them. If you have a modern C* then you may wish to try a thicker read on it.

SuperDave
10-01-2007, 06:57 PM
I have a Rast customized Soloist-style piece, he does them in 2 sizes, I went with the smaller opening, as I wanted to be able to play low and soft. I also have a vintage short shank Soloist that I have had for about 25 yrs. It is bright and too closed...I have thought about having Fred open it up to the Garrett opening...since the other piece plays so well.

blue boy
10-02-2007, 03:35 AM
The Rast Soloist (.96) has ended my search for an alto piece. It is very versatile, the only alto piece (jazz/R&B/rock) I'll ever need. Highly recommended.

Dweekie
10-02-2007, 02:52 PM
I had at one time a Mojobari Modern Soloist, Eric from mouthpiece guys Short Shank soloist, and a JVW long shank soloist. They all played vastly different, from very sweet (modern soloist) to gobs of power (jvw soloist). I guess if you get anything worked on, comparisons don't matter at all. You can tell I enjoy the soloists.... I'll have to look into the Rast soloist.

jd
11-02-2007, 11:14 PM
I never was a big fan of the older soloist but I recently have been playing on a new soloist reissue and they play louder and brighter but still maintain a good core sound. I tried it on a yamaha then later on my old mark 6. the sound on the mark 6 is really nice! also its the easiest mouthpiece ive ever played . mine is a d facing. Ive tried many old soloists and have never got this type of response. (im used to jumbo java and dukoffs and lost no power/projection.) I know that sounds strange but for me its true ..

MM
11-03-2007, 06:46 AM
Jd is right, Soloists are an excellent fit to the Mk VI. Since they came with the horns I guess it shouldn't be a suprise. When I played a C* on my old 119xxx VI it would project nicely. Though not quite "loud big band lead" volume.