PDA

View Full Version : Jazz Mouthpiece for Tenor Sax


tenorOWNZ
06-01-2003, 09:43 AM
I'm wanting a real good jazz sound with my tenor and I'm looking for the best jazz mouthpiece I can get in the $60-$120 range. I know absolutely nothing about mouthpieces, I went to a local music store and was clueless on which mouthpiece did what, which was better, etc;. Anyone gimme any clues on where to look?

MojoBari
06-01-2003, 02:03 PM
What do you play now? What are your sound goals? Who do you like?

sjabariiii
06-01-2003, 03:04 PM
www.wwbw.com has a huge selection and a trial policy. (you have to call them and they'll send you 4 mouthpieces to try out with 25% deposit). Under $120 I'd stick with hard rubber/plastic. Morgan, Runyon, Otto Link are popular. The folks here will respond to inquiries about how specific pieces sound and how the quality control is (varies widely in different brands). Or browse some old posts for ideas.

-ANDYJ

Kosma
06-01-2003, 03:57 PM
You are about to enter the labyrinth! Ultimately no one can tell you what is the best mouthpiece for you but we (the people on this forum) can save you literally years of stumbling around in the dark.

That said, I strongly recommend a Morgan. I've been playing them for 6 or 7 years now after stumbling around in the dark myself for many years.
No other brand even comes close in the consistency department. Every one I have ever tried (well over a dozen) played well. That's because they're hand finished, among other reasons. Unlike Runyon or Link or anything else in the price range. All you have to worry about is finding the best tip opening and chamber size for you and your horn. As opposed to most other brands where you have to worry (or wonder) whether a piece is flawed out of the factory.

Many people on this forum recommend and play Runyons so there are no doubt some good ones but they are not hand finished making quality control/consistency an issue especially when mail ordering, and they're plastic (which I hate) instead of hard rubber.

I don't recommend Otto Link at all (vintage notwithstanding) because their quality control is pathetic to nonexistent. Most of them are not worth the box they stick 'em in. This goes for most brands that you will find in a store.

Morgans are around $140.

The only other brand I can think of worth checking out in your price range is a hard rubber Barone. Around $100. As far as I know these are still hand finished.


Give us some more info on your current setup and what sound you like.

Good luck on your search!

I'm gonna crawl down in my bunker now to await the siege of the Runyonites!

tenorOWNZ
06-01-2003, 05:12 PM
Right now I just own a concert mouthpiece. It's out a real big clean sound which is nice, but that jazz tone is what I'm out to get. I'm playing on a horn I'm sure none of you have heard of but you can check it out here:

http://www.zacharymusic.com/Zachary_Music/NewSax.htm

It is the ZeuS ZTS 650 tenor.

Probably my favorite sax player is Sonny Rollins, I really that sound.

I have noticed everyone talks about Runyons on here so I will check that our first, but that doesn't mean as Kosma said that a Morgan or any other brand is just as good. Is there like sizes on the mouthpieces or are they all the same? If so what size will be best for me?

Thanks for all the comments so far, I think I'm gettin close to knowing a little about what I'm out to look for :)

mbarnard
06-01-2003, 05:43 PM
The Morgan is a great choice (I like the M series myself). For a bit less money, you should also consider the Vandoren Java mouthpieces (NOT the Jumbo Java), also a great mouthpiece. Make sure you know what tip size you're playing now, and don't buy a mouthpiece with a tip size considerably larger. Regards.

Kosma
06-01-2003, 06:29 PM
I'd still like to know what kind of mpc you are playing now. 'concert' is pretty vague.

On sizes: The two main variables are tip opening and chamber size.

Tip opening is denoted by a number (or letter in the case of selmer).
Chamber size is small medium or large and may or may not be marked.

Generally speaking, tip opening choice is mostly about comfort and chamber size is about sound.

Again generally, a medium chamber is brighter and a large chamber is darker.

There are exceptions though. One example being my mpc. It's a Morgan 7EL. The L is for large chamber but it plays at least as bright as my 6M (medium chamber).

I hope this gives you some guidelines to follow.

tenorOWNZ
06-01-2003, 10:16 PM
My mouthpiece right now is a Vito II. Other than Woodwind Company, thats all it says on the mouthpiece. So as far tip opening or chamber size I'm clueless to what it is. I like a real bright sound most, so a small chamber mouthpiece may be ideal for me. But if the small chambers sound off and aren't used commonly, I think I would rather go with a medium. I'm not to interested in a dark sound, so I will stay away from a large unless there is one like the one you are talking about.

Also, I need to find out somehow the sizes of my mouthpiece I'm on right now, any ideas where to look? One more thing I saw on my mouthpiece is a little drawing which is a circle with a triangle inside, but I believe this is just the Vito logo.

Kosma
06-02-2003, 05:48 AM
Most likely that pc is around a 5 tip opening and medium chamber.

I think you would be very happy with a Morgan 5M or maybe a 6. You'd probably be amazed at the difference and much more comfortable.
Try some Runyons too, why not.

I wouldn't recommend a small chamber. I don't even know who makes one now. Maybe Meyer still does. I have a few old Vandorens with small chambers but they don't play very well.
I think they're odd and I've never even heard of anyone playing one.

Ritchie
06-02-2003, 08:41 AM
Most stock mouthpieces that come with horns are narrow to medium pieces, and too narrow for a full Jazz sound. Many Jazz players use wider tip openings than a 5. Those who use the narrower pieces (e.g. Stan Getz, John Coltrane) use hard reeds with them. Sonny Rollins, who you mentioned you liked, plays wide mothpieces with medium reeds, and he has been using a couple of mouthpieces over his carreer. In the 50's he played most often a metal Otto Link (around 10), then a Selmer (was it an H?) around the "The Bridge" recording, then he switched to Berg Larsen stainless steel (130/2) and LaVoz medium, which he apparently still plays today. He used several others, like Lawton or Wolf Tayne.

I do NOT recommend you simply copy the setup of any player and expect to sound like him. But I'd encourage you to try a more open mouthpiece than a #5. Remember also, the numbering of mouthpieces is different for different brands, there are comparison charts available in the net (e.g. http://www.saxgourmet.com/mpfacing.html). For Jazz tenor sax a tip opening of 100-110 would be a medium and a good place to start if you have some experience with your stock mouthpiece. A popular choice for a Jazz mouthpiece is an Otto Link 7* or 8, metal or hard rubber. The metal is available with the regular chamber or as "NY" with a bigger chamber for a fuller and darker sound. I cannot confirm the quality control is as bad as Kosma said, at least not in Europe. I tested and bought a couple of Links over the last two years, all of them were good players right out of the box.

If you switch from your current mouthpiece to a wider tip opening, combine it with a soft reed (1,5 or 2) in the beginning. Practise long tones to build up your breath support and embouchure, then increase the reed hardness step by step until you get the sound you like and the setup that suits you the best (most probably a #2 1/2, #3, or #3 1/2). If you have to work too hard to get a sound, the setup is not the right one for you.

Smaller chambers will give a brighter tone, as Kosma said. A wider tip opening will give you a darker tone, but it can be combined with a softer reed, which then gives a brighter tone than a harder reed. Another variable not mentioned yet is the baffle, size as well as design. Higher baffles (i.e. a narrower space between mouthpice and reed) make a piece brighter and easier to play. But the tone becomes thinner. The curve and evenness of the facing also makes a lot of difference how easy and consistent a piece plays. On http://www.mouthpieceheaven.com you can learn a lot about mouthpiece terminology and variables. You'll also find a list of setups of popular players there.

There is only one basic rule for mouthpiece choice: Try before you buy!

MojoBari
06-02-2003, 04:40 PM
tenorOWNZ, what is your experiance level? The advice is good above, but it needs to be catered to your abilities.

Kosma
06-02-2003, 10:03 PM
Mojo, He said on another thread that he had 4 months of experience.
That's why I recommended a 5 or 6.

tenorOWNZ
06-03-2003, 01:23 AM
This is my second time to type this message, I had it all completely finished then I went to submit and It deleted everything. Alright, I have pretty much decided on a few things. A medium chamber mouthpiece will probably give a sound closer to the sound I'm wanting. As far as tip opening I'm not real sure though. I want it to be as easy to play as possible but If ease of play means not as good of a sound then I will go with something bigger than a 6 which I had in mind.

I've always used thin reeds on every instrument I play, they are just easier to work with. On sax I use a 2. As far as tip opening though, I put alot of air in the horn usually but if the opening is so big to where I'm taking breaths every measure that's definately not what I want. So, from what all of you have said I think a 6 would work best. But I can't say that with confidence.

I do have about 4 months of experience on sax, but a considerable more amount on clarinet, bass clarinet, and similar instruments. Sax came easy to me and I'm already playing on a level similar to an average person who has been playing for 2 years. So with all of that being said, you should be able to judge the best tip opening for me. I like ease of play without sound compromise, and also take into consideration the bright, full sound I'm after. Put all this together and give me your best opinion on what I should be getting. Also, the three names I'm going to be looking at once I've decided the tip opening I'm going to want are Runyon, Morgan, and Otto Link. Which ever one of them is the best bargain I will grab.

Funky Chicken
06-03-2003, 04:15 PM
As Ritchie said, Bergs are wonderful and with lavoz theyre excellent combination..
I use almost the same as sonny did (or does, i don't know exactly what he uses today)- metal 120\2 and Lavoz Medium and it works great for me.

Bill Gaulke
06-04-2003, 08:04 AM
TenorOWNZ

I have something you might be interested in.. Being you want a easy blowing mp.... I'm at: <bgaulke@techline.com>

RaZaDAM
06-04-2003, 09:57 AM
I think the stock vito mouthpieces are 4C...same as the Yamaha's.

Adam.

ZenBen
06-05-2003, 05:24 PM
Well, someone's gotta say it. Otto Link - the most popular jazz mouthpiece ever. If you learn to get a sound that you like out of a Link, you know that the sound is coming from you and not the mouthpiece. I suggest you start with a 6 opening. Morgan is not a bad choice either.

Vader
06-05-2003, 08:47 PM
Ritchie, excellent link. That was really usefull to me.
The best rubber mouthpiece I ever played was a Morgan. Hands down. Nicely priced as well. Berg's are nice too, although, i've never played the rubber ones.
I'm honestly surprised at how many people talk about Runyon here. It's blowing my mind. I have truly really never taken Runyon seriously, but from reading all the input about them, i'm going to try one just to see what I think of them.

tenorOWNZ
06-05-2003, 08:49 PM
Yeah, I'm starting to lean towards a 6 or 7. Alot of places the tip opening is listed as .110 or something like that and aren't clear whether it is a jazz mouthpiece or not. Some suggestions on where to find a Runyon, Morgan, or Otto Link jazz mouthpiece would be helpful. Medium chamber, 6 or 7 top opening, all the other specs are up to you. Thanks.

Kosma
06-05-2003, 10:06 PM
For Morgans: www.junkdude.com

Specs are listed on the site.

I do know that a Morgan 7 is .095

JL
06-05-2003, 10:30 PM
Be careful regarding the number system for a given type of mpc compared to actual tip size. Every mpc manufacturer uses their own system and they don't all coincide. For example, a Morgan 7 may not be the same as a Runyon 7 or an Otto Link 7. They could all be different. Steve Goodson (saxgoumet.com) has tables listing the various sizes for different brands.

You'll get as many different opinions on mpcs as there are mpcs. Gotta try several and make up your own mind. One very important factor is that you have to play a mpc for several days to really find out how well it works, although you could probably eliminate some after playing only a few notes.

Bill Gaulke
06-06-2003, 07:21 AM
TenorWZ

I have a brand new metal tenor mp that measures a good #6,, it's metal and brand new, with lig and cap... if interested let me know,,
Bill

tenorOWNZ
06-06-2003, 07:18 PM
Bill,

I cannot get a metal mouthpiece. Nickel (used in alot of metal things) is one thing I'm allergic to. Unless the mouthpiece has no nickel in it I cannt get it...but if you know for sure that it doesn't email me at brad@netcommander.com with more specs.

Vader
06-06-2003, 09:46 PM
That's rough. Nickel's in everything. Man, you can't even drink a Coke out of the can(one of life's finer pleasures only rivaled by the ever rare glass bottle). Bummer.
I know because my mother's allergic to nickel.

tenorOWNZ
06-07-2003, 01:20 AM
Strange thing is, I can drink out of a coke can fine. I noticed I was allergic to it back when I had braces, they were nickel and caused me to break out really bad. I got a different type put in and it all went away the next day. To this day I'm still not sure about it all, but just to be safe I think I should stay away from buying a metal mouthpiece. My watch which is nickel caused several rashes on my arm also, but they were just minor. So I'm still pretty sure I'm allerigic to it. But who knows...

Eulipion2
06-07-2003, 04:42 AM
Man, I can sympathize. When I was a kid I was allergic to metal. My belt buckle and watch band always broke me out, and my neckstrap with little metal rivets really killed my neck. Fortunately, I grew out of it. As for metal mouthpieces, is there nickle in stainless steel? Never was good at metallurgy. Stainless steel mouthpieces include Berg Larsen and Lawton. Or, if you have an extra $400 or so you're not using, you could go for a Brendan Tibbs sterling silver piece :D

Eulipion2
06-07-2003, 04:43 AM
Man, I can sympathize. When I was a kid I was allergic to metal. My belt buckle and watch band always broke me out, and my neckstrap with little metal rivets really killed my neck. Fortunately, I grew out of it. As for metal mouthpieces, is there nickle in stainless steel? Never was good at metallurgy. Stainless steel mouthpieces include Berg Larsen and Lawton. Or, if you have an extra $400 or so you're not using, you could go for a Brendan Tibbs sterling silver piece :D

tenorOWNZ
06-07-2003, 07:10 AM
I didn't realize so many people were allergic to metal. Every doctor I ever went to always talked about how rare it was. I think I'am growing out of it a bit, I can wear my watch for 2 or 3 days before I start breaking out, and I can drink out of a coke can and things that aren't 24/7 like the braces I had when I first realized I was allergic to nickel. Of course I got them changed out, but all of this shows I'm not highly allergic to it, just if keeps on occuring, there will be a problem. I don't think stainless steal has nickel in it, because I remember my dentist putting a stainless steal wire in...I'm not sure either though. $400 dollars is a little pricy, I could buy another sax for that :) What is the real difference between metal mouthpieces and others? Is there any?

MojoBari
06-07-2003, 03:13 PM
Stainless is primarily nickel, then chromium and some steel (iron). The higher grades of stainless have less or no iron. A magnet will not stick to them. Its the iron that rusts (stains). It is possible that alloyed nickel does not create the same allergic reaction as pure nickel.

Just stick with non-metal mouthpieces. There are plenty of good ones.

tenorOWNZ
06-08-2003, 12:24 AM
I really am considering staying away from metal mouthpieces, If I buy one and every time I play it I break out for a week then it won't be a good investment as I told Bill Gaulke in email which is offering a metal mpc to me. What are the best sites to buy a mouthpiece?

MojoBari
06-08-2003, 04:40 AM
The ones with the best trial/return policy, best selection and best price. Woodwind and Brasswind is probably the best overall. Runyon is good but you pay for the good service with higher prices. Charlie A has discounts on Runyons, but may have a restocking fee (25%?) as do some others. Jody Jazz is a good value.

Exiled92
06-25-2003, 04:24 PM
I have been reading on SOTW for a while, but I'm new as far as posting is concerned. I have learned a great deal from some of the regular posters, not the least of whom is MojoBari. In my non-musical life I'm a physical chemist, and the note above about stainless steel alloys caught my attention. Even though the point is somewhat peripheral to this topic, I unfortuantely have to disagree about the compositions of stainless steel alloys. [ If you're not interested in these details, skip to the last paragraph NOW. ]

Iron is the largest component of ALL stainless steels. The composition table I am looking at (CRC handbook of chemistry and physics) shows that the alloys with the largest amounts of other materials are 310, 310S, and 314. These have as much as 54% non-iron content (26% chromium, 22% nickel, 5 to 6% other stuff), but the balance is iron. Stainless steel doesn't rust because the chromium atoms migrate to the surface. The fact that some alloys are nonmagnetic doesn't mean there is no iron in them; ferromagnetism is a weird phenomenon that depends on more than just the presence of some iron atoms. That, however, is WAY off topic.

The main point that was being made, I think, is still true: stainless steel mouthpieces have nickel in them, so someone who is allergic to nickel should stay away from them. I have a question, though: how much of a problem is nickel allergy with mouthpieces made of brass (primarily copper and zinc) or those that are plated with gold, silver, or chromium? I suppose these are only any good until the plating wears through, but are they fine as long as the plating is intact?

MojoBari
06-25-2003, 06:03 PM
Good to have a physical chemist weighing in! You are of course correct on the iron content of stainless steels. I use a lot of exotic alloys in my day job that include Nichromes, Inconnels, and high grade SS. Most of that list are alloys with high Nickle, so I though SS would too. With the exception of RA 333, all of the SSs do have mostly iron in them. I will defer to you about the rust and magnetic physics. Mine was a layman's understanding.

Chris
06-27-2003, 08:19 PM
For less than 120$ ?

ESM Ernst Schreiber Jazz for Tenor.

jazzmasta123
06-29-2003, 04:13 AM
i think that u would like a metal berg larsen..i have one ...and its GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGREAT..as tiger would say..lol those go for about $116-$125 at http://www.wwbw.com

BBSAX
07-01-2003, 12:42 PM
Berg Larsen Metal at about 100-105. I've got one and they sound great for jazz. You could also try a Jody Jazz, i've heard great things about those mouth pieces.

jazzmasta123
07-05-2003, 06:48 PM
If your going to play a Berg Larsen. I have found it best to use a Bass Clarinet reed. Say if you play 2 1/2 for tenor use a 3 Bass Clarinet reed for the best sound. USE VANDORENS! they are good reeds

tarzenonsax
07-11-2003, 08:15 AM
Hi all, I just wonder how jazz sax suppose to sound?
Is it dark and mellow?
or loud and bright?

Kosma
07-11-2003, 10:16 PM
Either, or both. Depends on what you want and the musical situation.

freerdr88
07-13-2003, 03:27 AM
woodwinbrasswind: www.wwbw.com
morgans are great

shmuelyosef
08-08-2003, 09:36 PM
Stainless is primarily nickel, then chromium and some steel (iron). The higher grades of stainless have less or no iron. A magnet will not stick to them. Its the iron that rusts (stains). It is possible that alloyed nickel does not create the same allergic reaction as pure nickel.

Just stick with non-metal mouthpieces. There are plenty of good ones.

Mojo, I don't like being disagreeable but stainless steel IS steel, and is MOSTLY iron. It is non-magnetic because it has a different crystal structure (austenitic vs. ferritic, if you are really interested, contact me off line). Almost all stainless steels contain between 10-20% nickel by weight, and most contain about 20% chrome. The remainder of the alloying elements are in small amounts to improve anti-corrosiveness, machinability, toughness, etc.

Dr G
08-08-2003, 10:04 PM
Hmmm, wasn't this already handled back in June 25 by Exiled92??? Nice, though, to see that I'm not the only material guy. 8)

Saxophoon
08-09-2003, 12:12 AM
Hey dont put any limit on what you want. Dont go out saying "Im not gonna spend any more then..." The search for mouthpieces is neverending and you will always be looking for something better then what you currently have.

My advide to you would be that if you know jazz is really what you want and want to do then crack open the piggy bank and get something that you will be happy with for a long time. Better to get something that may be a bit more expensive but will perform the way you want it to then to limit yourself and get something that will give you the same problems that it gives to everyone else.
Now Im not saying bust out $800-$900 for a vintage, rare, practically divine mouthpiece but get something good.
If you dig Links dish out a little extra and get a Doc Tenney perfected Link or Wolf Tayne Link that will play beter then any stock piece you get.
Just look around find what you like first and then go about finding the best version of it whether its customized or special made just be willing to get the best for the price.

Dr G
08-09-2003, 12:33 AM
There's also a great 'piece available over on the For Sale area - check out the Jon Van Wie-modified J&D Hite. I have two of them made to similar spec's. You don't have to shell out max bucks to have some of the best work (that was) available. Jon was a real artist.

MojoBari
08-09-2003, 02:47 PM
Mojo, I don't like being disagreeable ...

Its OK. I was wrong. I said so on 6/25 above.